"Smith crushes Bayley" "Senate race is
history in the making" - "Smith beats Bayley
by mile", "Smith whips Bayley to gain show-
down with Murray" these were some of the
headlines in Seattle and around the country on
September 16, the day after Congresswoman
Linda Smith won the Republican Primary nomination for U.S. Senate in Washington state. Linda was vastly outspent by
her principal opponent, Seattle businessman Chris Bayley, who used $1.1
million of his own money against her.
A latecomer to the race, his ubiquitous flurry of press releases and taxes relentlessly attacked her. The
Republican Party establishment all
but endorsed her opponent, and
National Right to Life Committee
refused to support her despite her
100% pro-life stance, criticizing her
support for campaign finance reform
legislation. But, she won the election
and, in the words of her campaign staff "it was
a blowout!"
Linda, who doesn't trust the pollsters and people
who tell her she's going to lose, and who defeated
her opponent by a 2-1 margin, will now face incumbent pro-abortion liberal feminist Senator Patty Murray, a Democrat who was elected in 1992.
Mrs. Smith, who is 49, a wife, mother and grandmother, began her political career as a pro-life grassroots activist who was first elected to the state House of Representatives in 1983. She is the
author of two state initiatives and is the only woman
in state history to win a write-in nomination for
Congress. As a Congresswoman, Linda Smith has been a well-informed and passionate advocate for the right to life on the floor of the House.
As a leader in the effort to reform
campaign finance laws, Linda
declines financial support from political action committees and special interest groups, holds no fund-raisers in Washington, D.C., and will not accept help that's financed with unregulated "soft" money. Her victory is that much sweeter, knowing that her support came not from the usual
big-money wheeler-dealers, but from
"Linda's Army" 35,000 families
who signed on to help her raise money and volunteers.
In a race that will be the only woman-to-woman U.S. Senate race in the country this year and only the third in our nation's history, the
Republican Party leadership is expected to
support Linda Smith to the
fullest extent in her campaign
against Senator Murray. Total
Republican primary votes
added up to 49.87%, more than
the combined Democrat votes
of 48.55%, a clear sign that
Linda Smith has an excellent
chance of winning in
November.
National and state pro-life groups and individuals have a
huge stake in the election of
Linda Smith to the U.S.
Senate. She will be to the
pro-life cause what Senators
Murray, Boxer, Feinstein,
Snowe, Collins and Mikulski
are to the culture of death. For
the first time, we will have a
woman in the U.S. Senate who
believes in the sanctity and
legal protection of every innocent human life, born and
unborn, and is willing to work
hard to advance pro-life goals.
Linda can contacted at:
Linda Smith for U.S. Senate
P.O. Box 65117
Vancouver, WA 98665
Office: 9901 NE 7th Ave., B 236
Vancouver, WA 98685
Phone: 360/571-3606
Fax: 360/571-3609
|
We urge all of our supporters
to do whatever you can, as individuals, to help Linda Smith win
in November. "Linda's Army" must grow substantially larger if
she is to raise the funds necessary to defeat the well-funded
Murray. This race is likely to be the most watched Senate race in
the country, and we want to Watch Linda Win!
Mondale Liberal Heads
Republican Leadership Council
Lewis Eisenberg, confidant and chief fund raiser for pro-abortion Governor of New Jersey Christine Todd Whitman, heads
their newest effort to raise money for liberal, pro-abortion
Republicans, the Republican Leadership Council (RLC). Mr.
Eisenberg, who was appointed to the New York-New Jersey Port
Authority by Gov. Whitman, was a liberal Democrat who contributed to extreme liberals like Walter Mondale for President, Bruce Babbitt for President, Senators Ron Wyden (OR), Christopher Dodd (CT), Joseph Biden (DE), former Senator Don Riegle (MI), and current Democrat House Minority Leader, Dick Gephardt. The Republican Leadership Council is a new name for the Committee for Responsible Government which was organized by Whitman and Eisenberg in 1992 to raise money for pro-abortion Republican candidates. They claim to represent "common sense" Republicans. Of course, they think that we, who want to see legal protection of the inherent right to life restored in this country, are lacking in common sense. The RLC has recruited a handful of pro-life Republican officials, like Governor John Engler of Michigan, so the group can present itself as "inclusive". Governor Whitman hosted a 1,000 per person fundraiser for Engler, who actively campaigned for her reelection last November, in Princeton on May 26. While the RLC claims to be "inclusive," its history is clear. The Republican Leadership Council is a tool of the pro-abortion, liberal northeastern Republican establishment that is trying to run the GOP.
Beware if the RLC surfaces in your state.
More State Parties Adopt
Lambert Resolution
The following resolution was adopted by the Alabama Republican
State Central Committee on July 18, 1998: "BE IT RESOLVED
BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ALABAMA, that the
Republican Party of Alabama and the Republican National
Committee shall not support financially or by in-kind contributions
any candidate or nominee of this party who opposes measures, or
advocates weakening Alabama law, to end so-called partial-birth
abortions." It is now the official policy of the Alabama GOP
On Saturday, August 1, 72% of the delegates to the Oregon
Republican State Convention voted to adopt the Lambert Resolution.
The resolution, which is gaining support from state parties across the
country, requires that party funds and in-kind contributions be denied
to candidates who run as Republicans if they oppose banning the
heinous partial-birth abortion technique. Our thanks to Phil Tussing
who offered the resolution and stood strong. He won against tremendous pressure from the establishment wing of the Oregon GOP.
New Jersey RTL Stops Additional Funding of Planned Parenthood
Planned Parenthood's request for
an additional $3.6 million in tax-payer dollars in the FY 1999 state budget was rejected by the New
Jersey legislature, largely because
of well organized efforts by the
independent organization, New Jersey Right to Life. Marie Tasy,
director of public and legislative affairs issued a news release on July 1 in which she said: "Through extensive radio ads, legislative
mailings, meetings with key legislators and our improved ability to
access, activate and mobilize our networks and chapters, NJRTL
played a critical leadership role in this victory for the taxpayer."
Michigan Makes Assisted Suicide Illegal - Life Advocacy
Briefing, 7/6/98, reports that Michigan lawmakers on July 2
approved a ban on abetted suicide, seeking to restrain the state's most
notorious resident, Jack Kevorkian, from his lethal habit. Pledging to
sign the bill, which will take effect Sept. 1, Governor John Engler told Associated Press writer Greta Guest: "The measure ought to put
Jack Kevorkian out of business and end that sorry spectacle that's been
playing out these many years." Penalties include imprisonment up
to five years and fines up to $10,000.
South Carolina - The Hippocratic Oath that USC medical grads
take purposely leaves out the parts about "neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked ... [nor] give to a woman an abortive remedy." One
honor society member says "we take the oath so seriously that we don't
want to swear to something we don't feel comfortable upholding."
(communiqué, June 12, 1998)
Pro-Life Teachers Take On The NEA
Teachers Saving Children, Inc. issued a press release on July 10 which included the following information. "Pro-life educators at the
July 1-6 National Education Association Representative Assembly (NEA-RA) in New Orleans, Louisiana, voiced objection to the NEA's liberal abortion position, not once but five times. Teachers from Ohio, Illinois, New
York, and Oklahoma, challenged the NEA to reveal their abortion support. In a general business session, a pro-life Ohio delegate asked at what
point the NEA withholds its support of a woman's decision to abort,
commenting "It is unreasonable for our teachers' union to stand for a
practice that takes the lives of children, our clientele, before birth."
The delegate received a "no limits" response. Another delegate asked if
unanesthetized second and third trimester salt poisoning and brain
suction abortions were included in NEA's stand against mutilation and
suffering in its Human Rights Resolution, but was not permitted to
finish her question. "The pro-abortion position of the NEA is an issue
that pro-life educators say they will not let go until it is settled," said Connie Bancroft, Executive Director of Teachers Saving
Children. Connie can be reached at 330/537-2546.
Will Congress Move to Stop
Human Cloning Experiments?
Twin calves born Sunday, July 5 in Tokyo were the first calves
ever cloned from the cells of an adult cow. The calves were produced by a technique similar to the one used to create Dolly
the sheep in Scotland. On Feb. 16 of this year, U.S. scientists
cloned a Holstein calf named Gene using a different technique
that employed cells derived from a 30-day-old cow fetus. Cloning
expert Robert H. Foote, a professor of animal physiology at
Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., said the latest success has
"substantial significance.." "I suppose you could say that if you
can clone sheep and cattle from an adult, then the probability of
cloning an adult human being is less remote." (The Dallas Morning News, 7/6/98)
While the scientists race ahead, legislation banning human cloning experiments languishes in Congress. The pharmaceutical industry, which
reportedly spent $59.7 million to lobby Congress in 1997, has
worked overtime to defeat the ban, clouding the issue with false
claims that banning the cloning of humans would somehow
retard scientific advances in other areas.
However, the real issue at hand is that of the inherent right to
life of the human being from fertilization. In addressing a ban on
experiments in cloning human beings, Members of Congress have
opened the door to the reality that the human embryo deserves legal
protection, as a human subject, from being experimented upon
and/or killed. They have started to realize the implications this
would have for human embryos who are produced in in-vitro fertilization clinics, and are either implanted, frozen or killed. Those tiny
humans deserve protection as well. The door is currently standing
ajar. Will Congress, fearing the truth, close it altogether, allowing
unbridled science to have its way? Or will they act courageously to
protect all innocent human beings, no matter how tiny, from inhumane treatment, experimentation, and death?
Capitol Switchboard -
202/224-3121